There is always the hope, each New Year, that this one
will be better than the last one. The cartoonists’ wee sweet baby
arriving with the new year’s banner trailing from the crib is
usually shown replacing an old man limping, scratched and battered,
dragging the old year out behind him. All that is past is gone, the
whiteboard before us is fresh and unsoiled.
Except when it happens year after year, and one remembers
that last year wasn’t better than the year before, and that the
trend has been worsening with each passing year; hope fades and the
celebrations ring hollow. The new wee New Year’s baby didn’t
arrive—the old man is still in that picture!
And so I remember the words of a friend recently, commenting
on the church work being done in Israel/Palestine: “Those issues
you write in MennoLetter… I remember talking about them
when I was there fifteen years ago. And people told me then that they
had been writing home about the same issues years before that!”
Are we making any difference at all?
Does anyone care that the situation for Palestinians
now is worse than it was a year ago? And was worse then than it had
been the year before that? Or that Christians in the region are shrinking
away to an insignificant number, dropping rapidly? As the Archbishop
of Canterbury wondered aloud during his visit just before Christmas,
Are Christians an embarrassment to the Israelis. “It’s a
question!” he insisted.
And when the former mayor of Bethlehem spoke to a group
of Washington business people a few years ago, he confronted them with
the challenge of a sharp drop to minority status in the Christian population
among the people of his city, “Does it not matter to you that
your holy sites are being lost to you, and your [Christian] influence
fading to insignificance?”
Neither got an answer. What answer is there? The creeping
cancer of land takeover that is the internal policy of the occupiers
of the Palestinian areas seems to have it worked out—if it’s
slow, steady, constant, we’ll eventually get all of it. That
plan succeeded again in 2006.
And the MennoLetter articles continue …for a sixth
year. They must be written. —GEW
~OTHER
VOICES ...
By Helene
Cooper
US Scolds Israel on Plan for West
Bank Settlement
In
a rare public rebuke to Israel, the Bush administration said last
week that an Israeli plan to construct a new Jewish settlement in
the occupied West Bank for the first time in 10 years could violate
the terms of an American-backed peace proposal. “We are aware
of reports about the settlement,” said a State Department spokesman.
“The establishment of a new settlement or the expansion of existing
ones violate Israel’s obligations under the road map.”
Under the plan, Israel is not supposed to build more
settlements in the West Bank. The criticism was made as Secretary
of State Condoleezza Rice is expected to go to the Middle East early
in 2007 to shore up support for Mahmoud Abbas, Palestinian Authority
president.
Israel essentially decided to stop building settlements
in 1992 when Yitzhak Rabin became prime minister, although it has
allowed existing settlements to grow, even as it has publicly promised
to freeze settlement activity under the road map.
The Israeli announcement has particularly confounded
American diplomats because it appears to run counter to the prevailing
effort by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, who offered a series of gestures
to the Palestinians several days ago, after meeting with Mr. Abbas.
—New York Times
By Amy Peters, CPT Hebron
Learning
to Love My Enemies
One
of the reasons I came to Palestine was to help children get to school
and save them from nasty soldiers who caused them all kinds of trouble.
However, being a good peacemaker, I also came wanting to work really
hard at loving my enemies. My plan was to try to see the humanity
of these soldiers and identify with them as individuals rather than
as faceless, uniformed bad guys.
I did not have to work hard. In fact, I did not even
have to try. From the beginning, these evil enemy soldiers were happy
to respond to my greeting and even happier to chat for a while. The
times when we argued with their orders, they remained incredibly patient.
Many times, they calmly repeated that they had orders not to let us
pass and there was nothing they could do about it. They often apologized
for that fact.
Meanwhile, the innocent, oppressed Palestinian children
whom I was to support and protect were not nearly as innocent or grateful
as I expected. They mobbed us and stole from us, harassed, offended
and swore at us. It was the schoolchildren who were the ones to really
challenge my commitment to nonviolence. When they threw apples and
stones at us, I was tempted to leave them to whatever came their way,
or thinking that they deserved their fate.
I must continually remind myself that no one deserves
to live a life like this, and that these kids have been formed by
the conflict that surrounds them. It is no wonder they throw stones
and swear at anyone who invades their space. How are they to tell
which foreigners are here to help them and which are here to hurt
them?
As a wannabe peacemaker, I must pray to God to give
me love for these children—these children who cause me so much
anger and often feel like my enemies.
—Christian Peacemaker Teams
is an ecumenical initiative to support violence reduction efforts
around the world: http://www.cpt.org
By Rabbi Dow Marmur
Retaliation or Restraint?
The
predicament of Sderot, the town close to the Gaza strip, reflects
one of the fundamental dilemmas in current Israeli politics. Despite
the ostensible ceasefire, Qassam rockets have been raining down on
the area causing casualties and damage. The question we all ask ourselves,
therefore, is whether Israel should (a) retaliate
in order to silence at least some of the guns on the other side, or
(b) continue the policy of restraint as a first contribution
to peace with the Palestinians.
(a) Retaliation seems to be the preference
of the Israel Defense Forces [IDF]. It may also satisfy the residents
of Sderot and silence some of the Government’s critics on the
political Right. On the other hand, the previous policy of retaliation
hasn’t brought about the desired results. There are, therefore,
those who say that responding to violence with violence leaves us
with…violence. Had retaliation brought safety to Sderot, it
may have been legitimate but, as things are now, holding out for peace
may, in the long run, be more advantageous for all, including the
town and its surroundings.
(b) Restraint, however, has wide implications.
There seems to be a consensus that strengthening Palestinian President
Abu Mazen in every possible way is the best way forward. A concerted
effort by Israel, Egypt, Jordan, and a number of other Arab countries
in that direction may help bring about peace between Israel and the
Palestinians. Though short-term party politics may favor retaliation,
long-term statesmanship points to restraint.
“Opportunities to negotiate
must not be ignored,
however distasteful they may seem.”
Foreign Minister Tzippi Livni seems also to favor a
positive response to what some perceive as overtures by the Syrian
suitor, President Assad, even though—or perhaps because—Olmert
is opposed to it. This gives rise to another dilemma: (a)
As even many hawks seem to realize, there’s no military solution
to the conflict between Palestinians and Israel. Therefore, opportunities
to negotiate must not be ignored, however distasteful they may seem.
To lure Syria away from its involvement in Iraq and to create a wedge
between it and Iran should be of global interest. Israeli-Syrian talks
could be part of this strategic project, whether or not George W.
Bush likes it.
(b) On the other hand, even those
of us who believe that, despite obvious dangers as exemplified by
the Hamas administration, a Palestinian state is absolutely necessary
to restore some of the dignity of its citizens to bring about peace
are nevertheless less than enthusiastic about giving back the Golan
Heights to Syria. Such a step would in no way serve the Palestinian
people but only strengthen Syria’s strategic advantages vis-à-vis
Israel. Peace with Syria seems much less urgent than peace with the
Palestinians. The question remains, however, whether you can have
the latter without the former.
Tzippi Livni seems to think not. As she is emerging
as the strongest force in the present Government, her advice may very
well be heeded, even though the Right-wing opposition will rant and
rave in response. This gives us peaceniks cause for optimism.
—The writer is Rabbi Emeritus
of Holy Blossom Temple in Toronto
Cold Hard Facts:
96 % of 2006 Killings Are Done by Israelis!
The
Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem published
its 2006 annual statistics. This past year, we witnessed a deterioration
in the human rights situation in the Occupied Territories, particularly
in the increase in civilians killed and the destruction of houses
and infrastructure in the Gaza Strip. At the same time, there was
an improvement regarding violations of the right to life of Israeli
civilians.
Casualties in 2006 (figures in parenthesis
indicate the total figure since the intifada started):
According to B’Tselem’s research, Israeli security
forces killed 660 Palestinians (4005 to date) in the West Bank and
in Israel. This includes 141 (811) minors. At least 322 (1920) of
those killed did not take part in the hostilities at the time they
were killed. Another 22 (210) were targets of assassinations.
Palestinians killed 17 Israeli civilians (701) in 2006,
in the West Bank and inside Israel. In addition, Palestinians killed
6 (316) members of the Israeli security forces.
House Demolitions
Israel demolished 292 houses in military operations in the Occupied
Territories, 279 of them in the Gaza Strip. These were home to 1,769
people. Some 80 of these demolitions were conducted after the home-owners
received advance warning to the demolition. In addition, Israel demolished
42 homes in East Jerusalem that housed about 80 people.
Checkpoints and restrictions on movement
Deep within the West Bank, Israel currently maintains 54 permanent
checkpoints, staffed most of the time. Twelve other checkpoints are
within the city of Hebron. In addition, there are on average some
160 flying temporary checkpoints throughout the West Bank every week,
along with hundreds of physical obstacles such as concrete blocks,
dirt piles, and trenches to restrict access to Palestinian communities.
Palestinians have restricted access to some 41 roadways in the West
Bank while Israelis have full and unlimited access to these roadways.
Prisoners and Detainees
As of November, Israel held 9,075 Palestinians in custody, including
345 minors. Of these, 738 (22 minors) were held in administrative
detention, without trial and without knowing the charges against them.
—For additional information, write to: saritm[at]btselem[dot]org
(Note–to discouirage spam email addresses
are no longer hot links.)
By Shaykh Ali Gomaa, the Grand Mufti of Egypt
“I want to repudiate the actions
of a misguided criminal minority.”
Terrorists are
‘Criminals’,
not ‘Muslim Activists’
The
rise of extremism in the Muslim world has led to the widespread view
of Islam as a religion of violence, retribution and war. This is in
complete opposition to the truth of our religion and, on behalf of
the vast majority of the 1.3 billion Muslims who are ordinary, peace-loving,
decent people, I want to repudiate the actions of a misguided criminal
minority.
Firstly, they contradict the central theme of peace
in Islam. Peace is the greeting of Muslims amongst themselves, the
last word spoken by a Muslim in his prayers, one of God’s names,
and one of the names for Paradise.
Secondly, the Qur’an permits freedom
of belief for all of mankind by saying, “To you is your religion
and to me is mine.”
Thirdly, the use of violence is prohibited in spreading
the faith. The Qur’an explicitly states: “There
is no compulsion in religion,” and “Call to the way of
your Lord with wisdom and good counsel and discuss with them in the
most kindly manner,” and “God does not prevent you from
being kind to those who have not fought you on account of your religion
or expelled you from your homes, nor from dealing justly with them,
indeed God loves the just.”
Fourthly—and this is very important—none
of these extremists has been educated in genuine centers of Islamic
learning. They are, rather, products of troubled environments and
their aim is purely political and has no religious foundation.
Thus, terrorists are criminals, not Muslim activists.
My fear is that these extremists will convince the world
that the entire Muslim world is the enemy, and that a war on terror
is a war on the entire Muslim world. The Qur’an tells
us, “O people, we have created you from a single male and female
and divided you into nations and tribes so that you may know one another.”
When God said “to know one another,” he did not mean in
order to kill one another.
Whom should we trust? Should we trust the extremists,
or that upon which the entirety of Islamic civilization has been built
over 1,400 years? The first Prophetic saying that is taught to a student
of Islam is, “Those who show mercy are shown mercy by the All-Merciful.
Show mercy to those on earth and the One in the heavens will show
mercy to you.”
Should we trust the extremists’ views, or the
freedom of choice and belief that Islam has enjoined upon us? The
Qur’an says, “Truth comes from God, whoever believes
let them believe and whoever does not, let them not believe.”
The clarity of this verse is surely there for all to see.
—The full article is distributed by the Common
Ground News Service and can be accessed at http://www.commongroundnews.org.